An Open Letter To Trey Gowdy Regarding A HUGE Mistake He Just Made
I just love this letter. Seriously! Our elected officials are suppose to be the protectors and spokes people of “We The People”. Check this letter out. It’s great!
Reprint from Western Journalism.
Mr. Gowdy,
On Wednesday, you stated on Hugh Hewitt’s radio show that Congress doesn’t have the “authority” to subpoena the server Hillary used during her term as Secretary of State because “House rules” do not provide for that authority. You sir, have just admitted that you and the rest of the House believe that Congress is powerless and that we live in a Kingdom. I am absolutely sickened by the conviction by which you repeat this lie.
I guess this is what happens when we elect politicians who are fundamentally ignorant of the Constitution, its purpose, and the power and duty it imposes upon our elected representatives. This statement is so repulsive to Liberty, so abhorrent to the principles of separation of powers, and so loathsome to the understanding of our Constitutional Republic that ANY representative who believes what you said in this radio interview should be ASHAMED of themselves.
Alexander Hamilton said this: “your consciences will reproach you for your folly and your children’s children will curse you.”
Why don’t “House Rules” give Congress the authority? Because House Rules are invented by Politicians to create excuses for not following the Constitution. Then, they don’t have to do the RIGHT thing; they can do the politically easy thing.
Mr. Gowdy, if what you say is true, we are all subjects to the executive branch; and that means we live in a Kingdom and not a Constitutional Republic.
Sir, I believe you have forgotten that the House of Representatives IS the People. And you have just announced to the WORLD that the PEOPLE of American are POWERLESS to their government. I really do not know how to express just how despicable our Congress really has become.
Here is my advice:
Stop making excuses and DO YOUR JOB! Stop worrying about “House Rules” and follow the Constitution. If Congress is so fundamentally ignorant as to WHAT that job is, then perhaps they all need to immediately RESIGN their positions and attend some remedial training. May I advise that you need to abandon your errant law school training (I know, I went there) and get some TRUTH?
HEY TREY! I am NOT a subject. And if YOU believe you have no power to represent us, if you believe you have no power to defend Liberty, and if you believe you are powerless in front of a criminal who has participated in the murder of citizens, violated her Constitutional duty to the people, has aided and abetted the enemy, and should be charged with TREASON and conspiracy to murder…YOU need to hang your head in shame, turn in your resignation, and go home. May I suggest you reread Article 2 section 4?
Here’s what Article 2 Section 4 says: The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
See my article about Impeaching a President. Not so easy!
If you have any comments or questions, please feel free to contact me. I have some good sources of Constitutional Truth to recommend. Perhaps you might begin with Federalist #69 and the Cato letters. Perhaps this article might help?
Sincerely in Liberty,
KrisAnne Hall
In the last paragraph KrisAnne recommends an article. It’s an eye opener. Here’s what it says…
Standardized Testing For The Office Of President of the US
In Federalist Paper #69 Alexander Hamilton lays out the difference between a President and a King. At the time of the creation and ratification of the Constitution, many were concerned that the office of president, being held by one person, would become nothing more than a King in disguise. Hamilton takes the time to point out the extremely limited nature of the President to rest any alarm that the office of president would function as a King.
What if we created a standardized test to evaluate our presidents using the standards by which the office was created? Would our presidents pass or fail?
The President or King Standardized Test as authored by Alexander Hamilton:
A President of the United States would be an officer elected by the people for four years;
A King is a perpetual and hereditary prince;
A President, as commander-in-chief, would amount to nothing more than the supreme command and direction of the military and naval forces, as first General and admiral of the Confederacy;
A King’s power extends to the declaring of war and to the raising and regulating of fleets and armies;
A President would be amenable to personal punishment and disgrace;
A King is sacred and inviolable;
A President would have a limited power upon the acts of the legislative body;
A King has an absolute power;
A President would have a concurrent power with a branch of the legislature in the formation of treaties;
A King has the sole possessor of the power of making treaties;
A President would have a concurrent authority with a branch of the legislature in appointing to offices;
A King is the sole author of all appointments;
A President can confer no privileges whatever;
A King can make denizens of aliens, noblemen of commoners; can erect corporations with all the rights incident to corporate bodies;
A President can prescribe no rules concerning the commerce or currency of the nation;
A King is in several respects the arbiter of commerce, and in this capacity can establish markets and fairs, can regulate weights and measures, can lay embargoes for a limited time;
A President has no particle of spiritual jurisdiction;
A King is the supreme head and governor of the national church and can dictate what is lawful and unlawful for the subjects to believe or not believe;
A President’s power is in the hands of the People;
A King’s power is limited only by his own will, the power of his throne, and is despotism.
Now score your occupant of the White House; is he president or King? _______________